Coney_LS_banner

100Eyes Blog

Archive for April, 2009

Timothy Archibald Interview with Andy Levin

Thursday, April 23rd, 2009

Archibald

Q: Timothy, you describe “Echolilia” as a collaboration with your son, Elijah. Can you tell me more about that?

 

A: Around the time Elijah turn 5 we started making photographs together. I’d kind of initiate it with some direction, he’d do something that seemed unexpected…something I’d never have been able to think of…we’d look at the images together on the digital camera and try to refine them…try to improve them, try to take them in other directions. The idea of turning the creative control over to a child, while I operated the camera, allowed me to make images that seemed to have this sense of discovery to me. There was also alot going on at the time with Elijah…behavior things that we couldn’t make sense of.

Q: Can you tell me a little more about him?

 

A: For sure. He was always a kid who went to the beat of his own drummer….had a fascination with doors, mechanical gears, things that had a repeating ritual involved with them. After the project was begun we had him tested and he was diagnosed as being on the autistic spectrum. It came as a surprise…he’s not what we think of as traditionally autistic. He is a real communicator, but I think these days the spectrum encompasses alot of things. My wife and I still don’t know if we really agree with the diagnosis some days. But I do feel that the question….the search to understand what makes him tick, combined with his unique way of being in the world has fueled the project and given it it’s shape and structure.
Read More

Q: It sounds as though this was your way of playing together? Was that part of the relationship here? How specific was he about the way in which he wanted to be photographed?

 

A: I wouldn’t use the word play, it sounds too passive. A friend of mine would look at the work and could tell which images were being led by Elijah, it’s hard to get a kid to do anything he doesn’t want to do…like brush his teeth, for instance. The shoots last ten minutes at the most, but its ten minutes of hyper focus on his part. Sometimes I lead, sometimes he leads. And now it seems like we’ve learned what each other would want out of a shot…so its a collective brain a bit. I think he knows that we need to make these images, to like…figure something out. A friend asked me why Eli was doing all of this stuff with me and I didn’t really have an answer beyond him intuitively understanding that there is something serious going on here, we aren’t just goofing around. I think he knows that we need to make these images, to like…figure something out.

 

Q: Is communication an issue? What are Elijah’s verbal skills like?

 

A: No…this is a normal seeming kid who has a grand vocabulary and goes to public school and gets good grades…but he is different.

 

Q: So is the work autobiographical or fantasy, or a combination of both? Are these images about your son, or something else?

 

A: I guess I ask myself that question a lot. I always thought that the project had this element of role playing in it. My wife looks at the images and has always said that it looks like I’m trying to exert some type of control in the photos that I don’t have in real life…so I’m having us act it out for the camera.
For me the work is about a relationship, and I always think of a relationship having three components: him, myself, and then all that is shared…the shared intangible. With the project I always saw the photographs as what we did together, the scans as my voice, looking objectively at the documents, and then the thing we get when we look at all of the stuff together is the channel, the tone that defines the project…the echolilia thing. There are feelings that go along with your relationships with your kids: powerlessness, idealism, and just these moments when those you are raising just seem so alien…so foreign. And moments of transendent beauty as well. In doing a series about a relationship, I didn’t want to short change it, or dumb it down. I wanted it to have the complexity of emotions, the range, and try to touch on the emotions we don’t have the words for yet.

 

Q: The image of Elijah in the plastic tub, how did that happen?

 

A: Around the time I did that shot I had been shooting Eli doing curious things with his body but the locations of the shots were just not thought out…its like I’d shoot him where he happened to be. I showed the work to a photo friend and she essentially said that I’d need to try to find locations that were more…intentional, more able to look metaphorical. It made sense. I had been noticing the light coming thru that window at that time of day and we had an empty large plastic toy container in the room. I think my wife had an appointment that afternoon, cuz I recall I picked up both kids from school, but had my camera and tripod out, hoping to make some photographs. We came home and ate lunch. I asked him if he wanted to make some photographs in the plastic container in the sunshine. He thought it looked interesting and stood in it and then we just tried different things: standing, hiding beneath it, sitting up in it. We then realized that it could contain him lengthwise if he curled up a bit. He got in that pose, clothed. We looked at it and I suggested he take off his clothes so it would look like he was like in an egg, and was about to hatch out. He took off his clothes and got in and started aligning his body in ways that looked like the final shot. ” Move a foot…lift your chin…now close your eyes…ok, this looks real nice. Come out and see what it looks like. ” We’d look at the images on the back of the camera, he’d see what it looked like, and try again. At some point we got it and ended. We didn’t try other ideas then, just moved on to other non photographic things. I think his younger brother was in the room trying to watch a video….so it was chaos, but we got it. And then, the nudity: I really think of these images trying to be archetypal ( archetypes? sp?) , I want the feral child to be there. I don’t want to see a logo, a style, a t shirt with a ninja turtle on it. And then he’s in his school uniform alot, so it helps the idea of this looking like the child in someones brain or memory. Ahh…thats the goal.

 

Q: Over how long a period of time were these images made and where is this project headed?

 

A: We started midway thru his fifth year and now he is seven. The project is still going, we are still shooting, but I am trying to pause at this point and try to assemble the work into a book form with some text. Oh, I guess I should add that I’m pausing on the project to kind of evaluate it, see if the scans and photo idea works together, and try to come up with text that gives him a voice in the project. I’m using the format of a book to give it shape. Its more for the growth of the project than an attempt to get a publishing deal or something.

 

Q: You have a keen knowledge of the history of photography. How do you think your work fits in with that of other photographers who have done work with their family?

 

Emmet Gowin had shot his family in a series of photographs that always had this sense of intimacy that I never could understand or replicate until I had kids myself. It just had this sense of .hauntedness that made it seem like a childhood memory. I can’t replicate that, but there is some quality of memory I’m trying to tap into…like my own childhood memories. Elijah looks like me, so that may be fueling this all as well. Currently, I gotta say I respect the anxiety and sense of anxiousness in the family work of Tierney Gearon. In her work you can see the intimacy, but its wrapped up in this modern day angst, anxiety, mixed emotions that are honest. Its like anti- romantic, and it seems to give the complexities of the role of the parent its due. I mean, that’s what I see in the work, but maybe I’m projecting what I want to see. I want my project to tap into that anxiety, parent/child anxiety…and I think it does…but it needs to be more universal as well. These projects need to try to speak to everyone, not just people with kids.
Gowin and Gearon hit that sweet spot for sure.

 

Thanks Timothy and good luck!

 

Andy Levin April 2009

 

You can see Timothy Archibald’s work by clicking on the photo above or in 100Eyes: The Magazine along with work by Stephen Shames, Rebecca Drobis, Nicolas Axelrod, Yoon S. Byun and others. His website is http://www.timothyarchibald.com

 

Where am I now? (9)

Wednesday, April 22nd, 2009

ve_9

 

Another on Earth Day from Virtual Earth by Microsoft.

Read More

Where am I now? (8)

Wednesday, April 22nd, 2009

vr_7

 

More from Virtual Earth on Earth Day.

 

Where am I now? (7)

Wednesday, April 22nd, 2009

vr_8

 

More from Virtual Earth on Earth Day.

Where am I now? (6)

Wednesday, April 22nd, 2009

vr-6

 

More from Virtual Earth on Earth Day.

Where am I now? (5)

Wednesday, April 22nd, 2009

vr_5

 

More from Virtual Earth on Earth Day. Developments and box stores, but where?

Where Am I Now? (4)

Wednesday, April 22nd, 2009

vr-4

 

Where am I now? (3)

Wednesday, April 22nd, 2009

vr_2

 

Another capture from Virtual Earth by Microsoft!

Michael P. Smith Grant for Gulf Coast Photographers

Wednesday, April 22nd, 2009

New Orleans, LA (April 21, 2009) – The New Orleans Photo Alliance (NOPA) will announce the launch of the Michael P. Smith Fund for Documentary Photography (MPS Fund) at a reception Monday, April 27, 6 – 8 pm, at The Historic New Orleans Collection where a major retrospective of Smith’s work is currently on display. The MPS Fund was created by NOPA to honor the life and work of Michael P. Smith, one of New Orleans’ most legendary and beloved documentary photographers.

 

NOPA will award one $5000 grant annually to a Gulf Coast photographer whose work combines artistic excellence and a sustained commitment to a long-term cultural documentary project. NOPA will accept grant applications beginning June 1, 2009 and will announce the winner during this year’s PhotoNOLA festival in December.

 

The New Orleans Photo Alliance is a diverse group of photographers who joined forces in 2006 to create unity and opportunity for photographers in the Gulf South. NOPA is a 501c3 nonprofit organization that currently includes more than 300 members from across Louisiana and the United States. Since its inception, NOPA has sponsored photographic exhibitions, workshops and educational programs. It also coordinates PhotoNOLA, the annual photography festival held each December at venues throughout New Orleans.

 

Michael P. Smith (1937–2008), a New Orleans native and award-winning professional freelance photographer, spent a lifetime capturing the music, culture and folk life of New Orleans and Louisiana. Smith photographed every New Orleans Jazz & Heritage Festival from its inception in 1970 until his retirement in 2004, when he was honored with a major exhibition at the Fair Grounds. In a brilliant career that spanned more than four decades, Smith was an inspiration, a role model and a mentor to many photographers in New Orleans and beyond.

 

In 2007 The Historic New Orleans Collection (THNOC) acquired the Michael P. Smith Archive, which consists of photographs, correspondence, field recordings and ephemera. In addition to ensuring both the long-term preservation and ultimate public access of Smith’s work, the acquisition also served as the basis for the exhibition In the Spirit: The Photography of Michael P. Smith from The Historic New Orleans Collection now on display at THNOC and at the Contemporary Arts Center.

 

Located in the French Quarter at 533 Royal Street, THNOC is a museum, research center and publisher dedicated to the preservation of regional history and culture. The reception is free and open to the public. Food and drinks will be supplied. Sponsors of this event include the New Orleans Photo Alliance, The Historic New Orleans Collection, and Whole Foods, Inc.

 

For more information, contact Lori Waselchuk at 225-907-6695 or visit the NOPA website www.neworleansphotoalliance.org.

 

To learn more about the Michael P. Smith archive, the exhibitions, or The Historic New Orleans Collection, visit www.hnoc.org or call (504) 523-4662.

Resolve: Ernesto Bazan Interview

Tuesday, April 21st, 2009

bazan_live

Miami Herald Photographer Patrick Farrell: Pulitzer for Haiti Coverage

Monday, April 20th, 2009

 

Miami Herald photographer Patrick Farrell has won a Pulitzer for his news coverage of the storms that ravaged Haiti in August and September of last year. Farrell was in Cabaret , Haiti, near Port au Prince, when 12 children were pulled from the mud that had swept down onto Cabaret from the surrounding hills after Hurricane Ike.

Although the photograph of the newsroom raising champagne glasses to celebrate the award might have been better left untaken, Farrrell’s voice, cracking with emotion in his voice over to the online slideshow, reveals the empathy that he has for the Haitian people, and is one of the best pieces of multi-media I have seen in awhile.

 

Of particular interest to me was Farrell’s description of the great care which a father took in choosing a pretty dress for his daughter to be buried in. It reminded me of the photograph Klavs Christiansen image that I published in a previous blog, of a Haitian girl in a pretty dress, sitting in a chair, surrounded by mud, in Gonaives. Are Christiansen’s as powerful as the b/w frames that won the Pulitzer? Of course not, but they do reveal something of the paradox of Haiti, that even in the Western Hemisphere’s poorest country, beauty is something that has a meaning in the lives of the people. Only a broad and diverse vision can depict the spirit of Haiti; narrowing the focus by red-lining styles is counterproductive and will only result in one-dimensional redundancy.

 

Hopefully all of this attention to Haiti will reiterate concerns about the fragile state of the environment which was further degraded from its already compromised state by the storms that Farrell documented. Although less people were killed in Haiti than in New Orleans after Katrina (800, according to the government’s tally, ) the chances of catastrophic storms in the future are now almost inevitable, and my own fear is that tens of thousands of lives may be at risk to future storms, or to earthquake or landslides in the Port au Prince area, and more Pulitzer and World Press awards to given. I say this not to denigrate the awards, which are justified and well-earned, but to lament the plight of the Haitians who endure hardships beyond imagination yet seem happier than many Westerners.

 

Ken’s Latest Rant

Monday, April 20th, 2009

Ken Jarecke has a new rant on his website, and Ken always has something interesting to say. His topic now is the predictability of magazine photography, and as usual Ken’s posts always make me feel a bit defensive, and at the same time somewhat in agreement, or just confused.

 

ken_1

 

Now what this means, I think you need to click on that passage to find out, but I often wonder if the angst that Ken expresses isn’t as much directed at himself, as it is the rest of us. Aren’t we all struggling with finding a way to see things uniquely, and isn’t this especially different, especially the older one gets and the more than one has already seen? Is the answer to drink more, or look through the lens more, or use some mind expanding drugs? I’d like to know, as I think we all struggle with this gorilla on on backs…..

 

Where Am I Now? (2)

Monday, April 20th, 2009

virtual_3

 

Win a Hubig’s pie if you can guess the location. By the way, if you don’t already know, these are captures from flights on Virtual Earth, a fantastic program from Microsoft…..

 

Where Am I now?

Sunday, April 19th, 2009

saltdesert_2

 

Previous location

What’s Wrong with this Picture?

Sunday, April 19th, 2009

What’s wrong with this starkly beautiful picture taken by Klavs Christiansen in Haiti? As far as I am concerned nothing is wrong with it, but according to the judges of a Danish photography competition, the photoshopping was so excessive that they disqualified the series and published a story about the disqualification, with the photographer’s permission, in a Danish on-line magazine. You can read the story of the disqualification here and follow the heated discussion that has unfolded on Lightstalkers.

 

A Photo Editor – Talented Photographers Are 99% A Pain In The Ass To Work With

Friday, April 17th, 2009

“It is no surprise that talented photographers are 99% pain in the ass to work with. They have strong opinions, are stubborn, reckless, and most of the time have an extremely bad character. But that is simply because they are constantly challenged by a reality that annoys them. Like being assaulted by mosquitoes, all the time. They don’t have an attitude problem, it’s the world that lacks one.”

 

Rob Haggart quoting the bohemian

 

Here we have one photo editor taking  another photo editor’s words out  of context and both of them coming out the worse for wear.    What  a shame, but in the “he quotes, she quotes” world of blogging,  the foggy area of who actually  said what seems to  blend into a murky world of grey.

 

I don’t think that either Rob Taggart or “the bohemian” actually believe that  99% of talented photographers are pain in the ass  or that having a strong personal viewpoint is necessarily  a detriment to doing contract work for corporate magazines, but be careful what you say in the blogging world, because like a boomerang, it may be coming back in your direction. My own opinion is that the best photo editors love working with talented photographers, for obvious reasons. Its about the pictures, isn’t it?

 

You can read the rest of the mud slinging here: A Photo Editor – Talented Photographers Are 99% A Pain In The Ass To Work With

 

Idle Chatter: Photo Gossip

Friday, April 17th, 2009

What notoriously stingy photographer, who took “that picture,” embarrassed his hosts at a recent photo workshop with his rudeness, leading them to remark

“and he shoots on automatic.”

 

Then again, what’s with shooting on automatic, even if $8,000 is a lot for a trip to Myanamar?

 

Only in New York: Book Dummy “Discovered” in Susan Sontag’s Trash

Tuesday, April 14th, 2009

Here is another bit of shameless self-promotion: this from my friend Steve Simon, writing in his blog on O’Reilly, about how I hooked him up with Life Magazine a few years back:

 

“Last week I talked about persevering with your projects. Continuing last week’s post, after getting a flurry of rejection letters from publishers about my proposed book, Empty Sky: The Pilgrimage To Ground Zero, I tried a different way of approaching my publishing problem. The late Susan Sontag lived in my building. She was connected to photography through her seminal volume entitled: On Photography. She was also an opinionated and well-known New Yorker. I thought that if she would agree to write a forward for this project, then maybe book publishers would take more notice of the work.

 

So I got the doorman Ralph Garcia to get my book dummy to her, which he did. The very next day I got a call from her assistant telling me how busy she was and it might take a few months for her to even look at it. I mentioned that I had extra copies and no expectations; I really just wanted her to see the work, and he promised me that Ms. Sontag would see the book dummy. That was that.

 

Months passed, I continued to seek a publishing deal, but kept getting rejection letters. I never heard back from Susan Sontag or her assistant. But one day I did get a call out of the blue from a photographer named Andy Levin, who told me he was looking at my work from Ground Zero, and that he liked it very much. He told me that he had purchased a book dummy of my work from a guy who sold it to him on Seventh Avenue in New York, for four dollars.

 

“What? Who are you?” I asked.

 

He went on to tell me that the guy who sold him the book dummy, plucked it from Susan Sontag’s garbage! I don’t use explanation marks often, but this was a lot to take in.

Andy Levin told me about his friend at Life Magazine (Barbara Burrows) who was publishing a commemorative volume of images post 9/11 that would be published on the one-year anniversary and asked if he could show her the work. To make a long story shorter, Life’s book, The American Spirit, with an introduction by George W. Bush–published 8 pages of my work from Ground Zero. I got my biggest paycheck since moving to New York in 2000, and with the credibility of the Life Book, I was able to find a small publisher in Montreal who published Empty Sky-The Pilgrimage to Ground Zero.

 

You can seeSteve’s website here.

He has a remarkable eye, and he is a nice person as well!

What’s Going On? – Great Advice for Photographers

Wednesday, April 8th, 2009

I stumbled Dawoud Bey’s blog somewhere along my web meanderings. Bey is a graduate of the Yale University School of Fine Art and is currently a Distinguished College Artist at Columbia College in Chicago. He offers this advice for young photographers, but I think it applies to photographers, and artists, on every level.

 

This from Dawoud Bey:

 

• Make good work! Be self-critical and informed enough to know if the work you are doing stacks up to the work you would like to be hanging next to. Through constant engagement with work that is being shown, know where and if your work fits into a particular area of current discourse. Nothing else matters more than this, and nothing else will make up for this if you are not doing it.

 

Put in 10,000 hours (see Malcolm Gladwell’s book Outliers. Gladwell posits that successful people—across a wide range of fields–have put in 10,000 hours of practice to reach their level of success.) Like any other profession, being an artist requires physically getting up and “going to work.” The sooner you begin your professional journey the more time you will have to put in the requisite number of hours.

 

Hang around people who are better than you think you currently are. The longer you hang around them and have conversations with them, the better you are likely to become. Be sure to actually listen to their feedback and figure out how you can use it.

 

• Assuming you are doing the above, show your work to as many people as possible. If you show the work to friends and associates, show it to those you think are doing work that is at least as interesting or more interesting than your own, who have even more experience than you do, so you can establish an ongoing critical dialogue with them. It is impossible to do good work, show it to a lot of people, and nothing happens. You have to believe this. If you are showing your work to informed viewers and no on is responding or talking your work up to other people, you need to take a long, hard look at your work. Do not be foolish enough to think that everyone else is wrong and that you are right! People that I know who look at work—even with very different interests and tastes—tend to agree when something interesting comes along. And if any one of them sees something interesting, they will usually tell someone else. I always talk to curators I know about interesting new work that I have seen, encouraging them to take a look at it as well. Usually we agree, and even if they are not able to do anything right away, they keep the work and the artist on their radar.

 

• Be informed. Know what part of the marketplace your work fits; both the marketplace of ideas and the marketplace of certain kinds of objects. Making art is not only about being creative, but understanding the broader context in which you are making your work.

 


Cultivate a community of support, and keep in touch with people, even when it doesn’t look like they are going to do anything for you right away. Form a community, don’t just “network.” I have had numerous exhibitions that were the result of keeping in touch with people for up to ten years. People can often be interested in your work, but it takes time for the right situation to develop for them to be able to do something with it. They also want to know that you, too, are in it for the long haul. The last thing they want to do is make an early commitment to someone’s work who then decides to give it up and go work for Verizon!

 

• Join those professional organizations that can provide a community, network, and professional information, such as College Art Association, Society for Photographic Education, and others. Attend their events and conferences and expand your knowledge and community.

 

Become an information junkie. Know about everything and everybody who might be interested in what you are doing. All information is useful at some point.

 

• Be prepared to make work for the long haul. Be a long distance runner. The great novelist John Oliver Killens gave me this advise thirty years ago, and it’s true. Your work should be something that you would be doing regardless of whether the larger market ever responds or not. Making art has to be your own particular obsession.

 

• Develop good communication skills. The ability to speak and write articulately and concisely about your work is absolutely essential, unless you have someone who will constantly transcribe and edit your thoughts for you, and also act as your press secretary so you never have to actually confront anyone or talk or write about your work yourself. The ability to write and think well is directly related to how much you read and absorb information. I would suggest that you read a lot in order to understand what a well crafted statement (about anything) looks like. Good writing tends to follow entirely conventional patterns and forms.

 

• Get a good education, whether from a good art or photography program or from your own obsessive seeking out of knowledge. They weren’t joking (whoever they were) when they said that “Knowledge is Power.” You need to know how to DO something; how to skillfully and consistently make something. This requires a respect for craft, knowledge and the necessary training to execute. If you choose to do it through an art school or program, it DOES matter where you go. Some places are better at this than others. Others are good at teaching a narrow range of conceptual theory and jargon, but may leave you unsure about how to give coherent and interesting form to those ideas. Art is a serious endeavor, and much like any other field requires training. You wouldn’t let a doctor with no training operate on you just because she was feeling ”inspired,” or because he or she had good intentions and some interesting theories about medical science. Unless you think art is a less serious pursuit, it should also require some serious skills and measurable competencies.

 

• Don’t be afraid to create new paradigms for how you can exist and function as an artist. A lot of the old paradigms were never meant to serve artists well in the first place. I don’t know any other field in which you can bear the full expense of production, then give someone 50% to sell the object or product, then pay the IRS the requisite 33% tax rate, and say you are doing “good business.” This is the “normal” paradigm of the commercial art world, and at a certain level it does work, particularly at the mid to upper levels. It doesn’t mean its the only way, and in the early stages your work will not be priced high enough to cover your costs of production, let alone pay your rent everymonth, under this structure at any rate. Other paradigms and strategies are possible. Much the way that musicians are finding ways to profitably get their work into the hands of their audiences without label support, so should other artists be devising ways of getting their work out there and truly supporting themselves. There are artists doing this with real success. Find out what they are doing and how they are doing it.

 

Follow the blog here: “WhatsGoing On?” – a blog authored by Dawoud Bey

and be sure to bookmark it.