<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: National Geographic Channel India Rights Grab</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.100eyes.org/2009/03/nat-geo-channel-india-rights-grab/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.100eyes.org/2009/03/nat-geo-channel-india-rights-grab/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 22:03:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Srikanth</title>
		<link>http://www.100eyes.org/2009/03/nat-geo-channel-india-rights-grab/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>Srikanth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 06:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.100eyes.org/?p=730#comment-137</guid>
		<description>I completely agree with the concerns expressed by Shamshad. 

Its a pity that such an unfair practice in the name of a competition is practiced by a professional body like Natgeo. 

Infact I also understand that Natgeo&#039;s editorial right allows them to even deny credits to the phtographer if the situation demands them to do so:(

Knowing very well the cause for which Natgeo stands, it should understand that by giving due recognition to the photographers, it is only furthering its cause of supporting and nurturing future work...

By the way, know one knows the true intention of Natgeo&#039;s contest. If its only to further the cause of increasing &quot;channel viewership&quot;, then I wish the channel the very best!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree with the concerns expressed by Shamshad. </p>
<p>Its a pity that such an unfair practice in the name of a competition is practiced by a professional body like Natgeo. </p>
<p>Infact I also understand that Natgeo&#8217;s editorial right allows them to even deny credits to the phtographer if the situation demands them to do so:(</p>
<p>Knowing very well the cause for which Natgeo stands, it should understand that by giving due recognition to the photographers, it is only furthering its cause of supporting and nurturing future work&#8230;</p>
<p>By the way, know one knows the true intention of Natgeo&#8217;s contest. If its only to further the cause of increasing &#8220;channel viewership&#8221;, then I wish the channel the very best!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shamshad khan</title>
		<link>http://www.100eyes.org/2009/03/nat-geo-channel-india-rights-grab/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>shamshad khan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 08:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.100eyes.org/?p=730#comment-72</guid>
		<description>yeah sure .. i agree! not NG !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah sure .. i agree! not NG !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
